Skip to content

Policy & macro ·

What an IMF Staff-Monitored Programme does and does not mean

An SMP is not financing and not an endorsement. It is a track record being built in public. Here is how to read one without over-reading it.

By ZIX Editorial

Macro desk · 9 min read

High confidence
A city street in black and white, cars parked along the kerb beneath commercial frontages

Keanne Chinyamunzore · Unsplash Licence

A city street in black and white, cars parked along the kerb beneath commercial frontages

A Staff-Monitored Programme is an agreement between a country's authorities and IMF staff to monitor progress against a set of economic targets. It carries no financing. It does not require Board approval in the way a lending arrangement does. Completing one does not entitle a country to anything.

What it does provide is a public, externally assessed record of whether stated commitments were met. For a country carrying arrears, that record is the necessary precondition for any eventual arrears clearance and re-engagement. The SMP is the audition, not the part.

The most common error in commentary is treating a review outcome as a verdict on the economy. It is a verdict on the specific quantitative targets in the programme, several of which are technical. A country can miss a target for reasons that are macroeconomically minor and pass one while the underlying position deteriorates.

The second most common error is the opposite: dismissing the process as irrelevant because it carries no money. Arrears clearance is the gate to concessional finance, and concessional finance is the difference between a debt position that can be worked through and one that cannot.

Editorial note: Scaffolding copy written to establish structure, voice and length. Replace before publication.

Sourcing

  • International Monetary Fund — World Economic Outlook database

    Pulled live from the IMF DataMapper API. The IMF is the only source publishing several series for Zimbabwe at all — general government debt and the fiscal balance among them — and where it overlaps with the World Bank the two sometimes disagree sharply, as on consumer prices from 2022. IMF staff figures reflect staff judgement rather than national submissions alone. World Economic Outlook projections are excluded from this platform; only actual years are published.

Corrections to this piece are logged on the corrections page.

All insights →